The AI copilot for recruiters

Automated sourcing, screening, outreach. Classic ATS interface always available.

Explore product workflows and limits to check

The limits of traditional tools

Classic tools for recruiting assistance are full of forms, screens and configurations. Consultants lose hours on admin instead of working with clients.

  • Dozens of screens and tabs to learn
  • Initial setup that takes weeks
  • No AI that understands consulting context
  • Data scattered across many tools
  • Reports always days behind

One AI, one conversation

hice.ai handles recruiting assistance like a chat: type what you want, AI acts on your real data. For those who prefer the classic approach, the traditional manual interface is always available.

  • «Show me the status of all open projects»
  • «Update X with what I'm telling you»
  • «Generate the monthly client report»
  • «Alert me if anything goes over budget»
Try it in chat

Examples you can ask:

Static demo of hice's AI chat.

What you get

AI chat in plain English

Talk naturally, AI understands jargon, abbreviations and context.

Real actions on data

AI doesn't just answer: it updates, creates, modifies, always with audit trail.

Total memory

AI remembers every conversation, decision and historical data point.

Native integrations

Calendar, mail, billing, databases: all connected.

Configurable automations

Triggers on events, conditions, deadlines: AI acts or alerts.

Conversational dashboards

Ask any chart in chat: no more complex report builders.

Multi-tenant

Per-client data isolation, granular permissions.

Full audit trail

Every AI action is tracked, reversible, exportable.

Smart notifications

Only notifications that matter, grouped by AI.

EU data & GDPR

EU hosting, encryption at-rest and in-transit, daily backups.

Fast onboarding

No weeks of training: a chat is a chat.

Traditional interface

For those who prefer forms, tables and classic dashboards: always available alongside AI.

The recruiter tasks worth automating first

A recruiter's week fragments into work that requires judgement and work that only requires time. Reading a hundred CVs to discard eighty is time. Deciding which of the remaining twenty to call is judgement. Automating the first without touching the second is where the hours come back.

In practice the highest-yield candidates for automation are the ones that repeat identically: extracting structured data from CVs in different formats, first-pass screening against explicit criteria, scheduling with several calendars, and writing the interview summary from notes. None of those decide anything; all of them consume afternoons.

  • Structured extraction from CVs in any format
  • First-pass screening against explicit written criteria
  • Scheduling across the panel's calendars
  • Interview summary drafted from the recruiter's notes

What must stay in human hands

The temptation once screening works is to extend automation into the decision, and that is where recruiting processes lose their credibility. The reject is the highest-stakes output of the process for the person receiving it, and it should never be produced by a system without a person behind it.

There is a second reason beyond fairness. A recruiter who reads the borderline cases learns what the hiring manager actually wants, which is rarely what the job description says. Removing that reading loop makes the process faster and the requirements permanently wrong.

  • Advance and reject decisions taken by a person
  • Borderline cases routed to review, never auto-rejected
  • Personalised messages to candidates who reached interview
  • Feedback from the hiring manager recorded on the role

Measuring whether the assistant is helping

The tempting metric is time saved, and it is the least useful, because it measures the tool rather than the outcome. A screening that is twice as fast and produces worse shortlists is a loss dressed up as a gain.

The pair worth watching is shortlist precision and time to first qualified interview. Precision is the share of presented candidates the hiring manager accepts as interview-worthy; if that rises while the calendar time falls, the assistant is working. If precision falls, the criteria need rewriting before anything else is tuned.

  • Share of presented candidates accepted for interview
  • Days from role opening to first qualified interview
  • Screening decisions overturned on human review
  • Roles closed without reopening within three months

Save a LinkedIn candidate, step by step

Open the LinkedIn profile you want to keep. Open the Hice extension and sign in, then choose to save a candidate. Review the preview: name, role, experience and other available information must belong to the right person. Complete required fields and confirm the save.

The operation concerns one profile at a time and starts with your choice. Browsing LinkedIn does not automatically collect lists. Once saved, the record is in your Hice database: add notes, a CV or a search link without retyping the profile from scratch.

Define requirements before requesting a shortlist

Separate necessary requirements from preferences: skills, experience, location and verifiable constraints. Ask the assistant to search accessible Hice data and show evidence and missing information for each candidate. Availability should not be inferred merely because a profile is public.

Connector search and model analysis are not automatically the same engine as Hice's native matching. Check available operations before requesting a function. If an attachment or semantic search is inaccessible through the connector, use the app's supported flow rather than expecting the model to read content it has not received.

Consulting firm, 80 consultants

An 80-consultant firm managed recruiting assistance with legacy tools: hours lost on admin every week. With hice.ai AI absorbs most repetitive work. Result: -50% admin time, +30% delivery capacity, managers more client-focused.

hice.ai vs traditional recruiting assistance tools

Featurehice.aiTraditional tools
InterfaceAI chat + classicOnly forms and menus
Native AIYes, acting agentNo / add-on
LanguagesMulti (IT/EN/FR/ES)Often EN only
SetupDaysWeeks / months
Real-time dataYesDelayed reports
Real-time KPIsYes: utilization, margin, benchDelayed reports
Learning curveOne chatLong training

Frequently asked questions about AI recruiter assistant

Do I have to abandon my current tools?

No, hice.ai integrates with main systems and can be adopted gradually.

Can I use only the classic interface?

Yes, the traditional manual interface is always available alongside the AI chat.

Is AI reliable on sensitive data?

Yes. Data hosted in the EU, encrypted and GDPR-compliant, with a full audit trail of every AI action.

Time to go live?

1-2 weeks: data import, configuration and team onboarding.

Works for small or large firms?

From solo consultant to firms with hundreds of consultants.

Pricing?

Per active user, transparent on the pricing page.

GDPR compliant?

Yes, with full audit trail and granular access control.

What support do I get?

Included onboarding, support in English via chat and phone.

Bring your recruiting assistance into the AI era

30-minute demo or instant free access.