T&M project management without spreadsheets

    Plan resources, track hours, control margin and billing: all in one AI chat.

    Managing T&M projects with generic tools is a nightmare

    Microsoft Project doesn't manage per-role rates. Jira doesn't know what an invoice is. Excel doesn't scale. Result: PMs spend half their time on admin instead of with clients.

    • Consultant allocation decided via email and chat
    • Hours logged in personal Excel sheets
    • Project margin known only retrospectively
    • Budget overruns discovered too late
    • Client reporting built by hand every month

    PM tool native for T&M

    hice.ai gives PMs everything they need to govern a T&M project: resource plan, hours, milestones, margin, client communication. All in chat.

    • "Status of the Eni project today"
    • "Replace Marco with Anna on BNL from Dec 15"
    • "Generali project margin this month"
    • "Generate work status report for Intesa"
    Try it in chat

    Examples you can ask:

    Static demo of hice's AI chat.

    What you get

    Resource planning

    Plan consultants per project/month with rates and availability.

    Milestone tracking

    Progress per phase, deliverable, client acceptance.

    Live burn-rate

    Hours consumed vs budgeted, alerts on overruns.

    Real-time margin

    Internal cost vs client revenue per project.

    Client status reporting

    Auto report for the client, generated with one command.

    Smooth resource swaps

    Replacements managed with automatic billing propagation.

    The economic layer a task tool does not model

    Classic project tools model tasks, dependencies and dates. On a time-and-materials engagement what has to be modelled is different: who works, at what rate, for how many hours and against which contract. Without that economic layer the plan can be perfectly on schedule while the margin deteriorates unseen.

    The usual result is an organization keeping the plan in one tool, hours in another and the margin calculation in a spreadsheet someone rebuilds every month. It works with five projects; with twenty-five it stops working and different versions of the same number appear depending on who prepares the report.

    • Rates by role and client tied to the current contract
    • Hours booked to project, activity and approval period
    • Consumption against budget visible during the project
    • Margin calculated with the real cost of assigned people

    Scope creep: catching it before it becomes a dispute

    The silent growth of scope is the main cause of time-based projects that end badly. It rarely arrives as a formal request: it arrives as a series of small favours, each reasonable on its own, that accumulate until they consume unplanned weeks.

    The defence is not refusing but making them visible as they happen. Logging the request, estimating its impact in hours and reporting it at the next review turns a later argument about the invoice into a decision the client makes with the information in front of them. In most cases the client approves the extension.

    • Log of out-of-scope requests with impact estimate
    • Warning when agreed budget thresholds are reached
    • Traceability of who asked for what and who authorized it
    • Comparison between scope sold and work actually delivered

    Planning resources when projects compete for the same people

    In a portfolio of time-based projects the conflict is about people, not calendars. Optimizing each project separately produces owners who reserve capacity just in case and a firm with people formally busy and actually available, or the reverse.

    Two rules solve most of it: allocation is decided in one place with a shared view, and every tentative booking carries a date on which it is either confirmed or released. Without the second rule, bookings extend by inertia and the bench arrives all at once when there is no room left to react commercially.

    • Visible distinction between confirmed and tentative allocation
    • Expiry date on every capacity reservation
    • Single view of availability by role and skill
    • Assignment end warning with enough lead time

    IT consulting boutique, 8 PMs, 25 active projects

    Each PM dedicated 1 day/week to internal and client reporting. With hice.ai: 1 hour/week. 7 hours/week × 8 PMs = 56 hours/week freed. In a year = an extra PM without hiring.

    hice.ai vs Microsoft Project / Jira / Excel

    Featurehice.aiMS Project + Jira + Excel
    Per-role ratesNativeNo (Jira/MS Project)
    Project marginReal-timeManual Excel
    Burn-rate alertsAutomaticHand calculations
    Client reportingAutomaticManual
    Billing integrationYesNo
    AI nativeYesNo

    FAQ

    Replaces Microsoft Project?+

    Yes for T&M consulting projects. MS Project is great for waterfall with complex dependencies, hice.ai for resource-budget-billing.

    Replaces Jira?+

    For project-resource-margin yes. Jira stays useful for software dev tasks, can coexist via integration.

    Gantt view?+

    Yes, Gantt for resource allocation and milestones.

    Scope changes?+

    Tracked change requests, budget and rate impact recalculated automatically.

    Milestone billing?+

    Yes. Configurable: monthly, milestone, completion, mixed.

    PMs have their own view?+

    Yes. PM dashboard with their projects, alerts, required actions.

    Share status with the client?+

    Yes. PDF report with one command, or client portal with filtered access.

    Mixed T&M + fixed projects?+

    Yes. Same proposal can combine T&M and milestone fixed components.

    Stop managing T&M projects with Excel

    30-minute demo or instant free access.